{"id":265280,"date":"2021-06-25T09:34:01","date_gmt":"2021-06-25T08:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/?p=243164"},"modified":"2021-07-04T22:36:08","modified_gmt":"2021-07-04T21:36:08","slug":"comparative-materials-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/comparative-materials-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Studio comparativo dei materiali"},"content":{"rendered":"

Una domanda che ci si pone spesso \u00e8 come si colloca l'impronta di carbonio dei cartoni (326 kg di CO2 per tonnellata di cartone) rispetto agli imballaggi a base fossile. Pro Carton ha recentemente intrapreso uno studio che non solo confronta i dati pubblicati sull'impronta di carbonio per tonnellata di materiale, ma esamina anche l'impronta di carbonio su base unitaria. Sono stati confrontati quattro prodotti, uno in confezione prevalentemente di plastica e uno in cartone, per tre prodotti alimentari e uno non alimentare. I risultati sono molto positivi per il cartone, anche se si confrontano solo le rispettive emissioni di gas serra fossili. L'analisi \u00e8 stata condotta da RISE, l'istituto di ricerca svedese, ed \u00e8 stata sottoposta a revisione paritaria da parte di Intertek, un'azienda leader nel settore dell'assicurazione totale della qualit\u00e0.<\/p>\n

Il rapporto pu\u00f2 essere letto e scaricato qui<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pro Carton ha commissionato uno studio che confronta l'impronta di carbonio degli imballaggi in cartoncino con le alternative in plastica. Sono stati confrontati quattro prodotti, uno in una confezione prevalentemente di plastica e uno in cartoncino per tre prodotti alimentari e uno non alimentare. <\/p>","protected":false},"author":4835,"featured_media":265504,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[79,52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-265280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brands-markets","category-sustainability"],"yoast_head":"\nComparative materials study - Pro Carton<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/comparative-materials-study\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"it_IT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Comparative materials study - Pro Carton\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/comparative-materials-study\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pro Carton\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/procartondesignaward\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sun Chemical\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@pro_carton\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@pro_carton\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scritto da\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sun Chemical\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo di lettura stimato\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minuto\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sun Chemical\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e\"},\"headline\":\"Comparative materials study\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":129,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Brands & Markets\",\"Sustainability\"],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\",\"name\":\"Comparative materials study - Pro Carton\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Comparative materials study\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/\",\"name\":\"Pro Carton\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ProCarton\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg\",\"width\":422,\"height\":519,\"caption\":\"ProCarton\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/procartondesignaward\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/pro_carton\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e\",\"name\":\"Sun Chemical\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/it\\\/author\\\/sun-chemical-8\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Studio comparativo dei materiali - Pro Carton","description":"Pro Carton ha commissionato uno studio che confronta l'impronta di carbonio degli imballaggi in cartoncino con le alternative in plastica. Sono stati messi a confronto quattro prodotti, uno in confezione prevalentemente di plastica e uno in cartone, per tre prodotti alimentari e uno non alimentare.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/comparative-materials-study\/","og_locale":"it_IT","og_type":"article","og_title":"Comparative materials study - Pro Carton","og_description":"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/comparative-materials-study\/","og_site_name":"Pro Carton","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/procartondesignaward\/","article_published_time":"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","width":1,"height":1,"type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Sun Chemical","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@pro_carton","twitter_site":"@pro_carton","twitter_misc":{"Scritto da":"Sun Chemical","Tempo di lettura stimato":"1 minuto"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/"},"author":{"name":"Sun Chemical","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e"},"headline":"Comparative materials study","datePublished":"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/"},"wordCount":129,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","articleSection":["Brands & Markets","Sustainability"],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","name":"Studio comparativo dei materiali - Pro Carton","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","datePublished":"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00","description":"Pro Carton ha commissionato uno studio che confronta l'impronta di carbonio degli imballaggi in cartoncino con le alternative in plastica. Sono stati messi a confronto quattro prodotti, uno in confezione prevalentemente di plastica e uno in cartone, per tre prodotti alimentari e uno non alimentare.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"it-IT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Comparative materials study"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/","name":"Pro Carton","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#organization","name":"ProCarton","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg","width":422,"height":519,"caption":"ProCarton"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/procartondesignaward\/","https:\/\/x.com\/pro_carton"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e","name":"Sun Chemical","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/author\/sun-chemical-8\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4835"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265280\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/265504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}