{"id":265280,"date":"2021-06-25T09:34:01","date_gmt":"2021-06-25T08:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/?p=243164"},"modified":"2021-07-04T22:36:08","modified_gmt":"2021-07-04T21:36:08","slug":"comparative-materials-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Estudio comparativo de materiales"},"content":{"rendered":"

Una pregunta que se hace a menudo es c\u00f3mo se compara la huella de carbono de los envases de cart\u00f3n (326 kg de CO2 por tonelada de envases) con la de los envases de base f\u00f3sil. Pro Carton ha realizado recientemente un estudio que no s\u00f3lo compara los datos publicados de la huella de carbono por tonelada de material, sino que tambi\u00e9n examina la huella de carbono por unidad. Se han comparado cuatro productos, uno en un envase predominantemente de pl\u00e1stico y otro en cart\u00f3n en tres productos alimentarios y uno no alimentario. Los resultados son muy favorables para los envases de cart\u00f3n, incluso si s\u00f3lo se comparan las respectivas emisiones de gases f\u00f3siles de efecto invernadero. El an\u00e1lisis fue realizado por RISE, el instituto de investigaci\u00f3n sueco, y fue revisado por Intertek, un proveedor l\u00edder de Garant\u00eda de Calidad Total.<\/p>\n

El informe puede leerse y descargarse aqu\u00ed<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pro Carton ha encargado un estudio que compara la huella de carbono de los envases de cart\u00f3n con las alternativas de pl\u00e1stico. Se han comparado cuatro productos, uno en un envase predominantemente de pl\u00e1stico y otro en cart\u00f3n en tres productos alimentarios y uno no alimentario. <\/p>","protected":false},"author":4835,"featured_media":265504,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[79,52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-265280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brands-markets","category-sustainability"],"yoast_head":"\nComparative materials study - Pro Carton<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Comparative materials study - Pro Carton\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pro Carton\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/procartondesignaward\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sun Chemical\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@pro_carton\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@pro_carton\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sun Chemical\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minuto\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sun Chemical\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e\"},\"headline\":\"Comparative materials study\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":129,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Brands & Markets\",\"Sustainability\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\",\"name\":\"Comparative materials study - Pro Carton\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/comparative-materials-study\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Comparative materials study\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/\",\"name\":\"Pro Carton\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ProCarton\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/06\\\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg\",\"width\":422,\"height\":519,\"caption\":\"ProCarton\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/procartondesignaward\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/pro_carton\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e\",\"name\":\"Sun Chemical\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.procarton.com\\\/es\\\/author\\\/sun-chemical-8\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Estudio comparativo de materiales - Pro Carton","description":"Pro Carton ha encargado un estudio que compara la huella de carbono de los envases de cart\u00f3n con las alternativas de pl\u00e1stico. Se han comparado cuatro productos, uno en un envase predominantemente de pl\u00e1stico y otro en cart\u00f3n en tres productos alimentarios y uno no alimentario.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Comparative materials study - Pro Carton","og_description":"Pro Carton has commissioned a study that compares the carbon footprint of cartonboard based packaging against plastic alternatives. Four products have been compared, one in a predominantly plastic pack and one in cartonboard across three food products and one non-food item.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","og_site_name":"Pro Carton","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/procartondesignaward\/","article_published_time":"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","width":1,"height":1,"type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Sun Chemical","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@pro_carton","twitter_site":"@pro_carton","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Sun Chemical","Tiempo de lectura":"1 minuto"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/"},"author":{"name":"Sun Chemical","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e"},"headline":"Comparative materials study","datePublished":"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/"},"wordCount":129,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","articleSection":["Brands & Markets","Sustainability"],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/","name":"Estudio comparativo de materiales - Pro Carton","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","datePublished":"2021-06-25T08:34:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-04T21:36:08+00:00","description":"Pro Carton ha encargado un estudio que compara la huella de carbono de los envases de cart\u00f3n con las alternativas de pl\u00e1stico. Se han comparado cuatro productos, uno en un envase predominantemente de pl\u00e1stico y otro en cart\u00f3n en tres productos alimentarios y uno no alimentario.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Comparative-Study-cut-down.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/comparative-materials-study\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Comparative materials study"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/","name":"Pro Carton","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#organization","name":"ProCarton","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/logo-mit-slogan.jpg","width":422,"height":519,"caption":"ProCarton"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/procartondesignaward\/","https:\/\/x.com\/pro_carton"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/#\/schema\/person\/e79cce4cecdff5567ec0d2cb9b860d3e","name":"Sun Chemical","url":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/author\/sun-chemical-8\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4835"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=265280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265280\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/265504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=265280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=265280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.procarton.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=265280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}